The two technologies sit in series on one air stream. Air crosses the evaporator first, where it is cooled and about 60% of its moisture condenses to a drain; it then crosses the rotor, which adsorbs the remainder down to about 0.1 g/kg. Condenser heat is recovered to pre-heat the reactivation air, so the rotor's heater — normally the biggest energy user — runs on partly free heat.
The coil takes the water that is easy to remove. Condensing is cheap per kilogram while the air is wet; sorption costs roughly 1.0–3.0 kWh per kilogram regardless, so every kilogram shifted to the coil is a kilogram the heater does not pay for.
Air leaving the evaporator is cold. A rotor adsorbs better cold, so the coil is not fighting the wheel — it is preparing the air for it. Reheat, where needed, comes from condenser heat rather than a new energy source.
Recovery coils transfer condenser heat into the reactivation stream. On machines without recovery this is the single biggest efficiency gap; with it, the heater only has to lift the air the last few tens of degrees.
Two actuators are coordinated against one dew point sensor: compressor capacity handles bulk load swings, reactivation heat trims the final dew point. Turndown is far wider than either technology alone.
Follow one cubic metre of summer make-up air through the machine. It enters at 30 °C and 70% RH carrying about 19 g of water. The evaporator drops it to around 10 °C, and 11.4 g of that water runs out of the drain as liquid. The rotor then removes a further 7.5 g, leaving roughly 0.1 g — the −40 °C dew point a battery dry room asks for.
The arithmetic is the whole argument. Sixty per cent of the water was removed by a compressor running at a coefficient of performance of three to five; only forty per cent was removed by a resistance heater running at a coefficient of performance below one.
Two technologies in one casing means two sets of things to go wrong: refrigerant charge, condensate trap and coil fouling alongside wheel seals, heater elements and drive belts. The coil also has a floor — below about 5 °C it starts to frost, so the evaporator cannot simply be pushed colder to take more load, and the machine still needs a drain and a trapped, insulated condensate line. In freezing ambient conditions the drain is a real liability.


A coating line needed continuous make-up air at −35 °C dew point with full fresh air, on a site where summer design is 32 °C / 65% RH and winter falls to 2 °C.
Winter was the harder case: the coil has little sensible load but the rotor still needs the same reactivation energy, so the heater was sized for January, not July. East Dehumidifier states the design-day pair a guarantee is based on — asking for that pair is the quickest way to compare two quotes honestly.

| Stage | What it removes | Energy mechanism | Typical COP | Leaves the air at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaporator | 11.4 g/kg as liquid | Vapour compression | 3–5 | 10 °C, saturated |
| Condenser / recovery | Nothing — moves heat | Heat rejection, recovered | Free | Reheated supply or reactivation |
| Rotor process sector | 7.5 g/kg by adsorption | Sorption, exothermic | — | 0.1 g/kg, warmer |
| Rotor reactivation | Strips the wheel | Electric, steam or gas heat | <1 | Exhausted outdoors |
Design note: the economics come entirely from shifting water from the bottom row to the top row. Anything that reduces coil performance — fouling, low airflow, a failed drain — pushes it straight back onto the heater.
Send your summer and winter design conditions and target dew point. East Dehumidifier will return the full state-point table for the proposed machine.
网络文化经营许可证:浙网文[2013]0268-027号|增值电信业务经营许可证:浙B2-20080224-1 2007-2026 Tradevv.com. All rights reserved.